ad

Cutbacks at Wrexham fire station could put lives at risk

Published date: 26 September 2011 |
Published by: Phil Robinson


 

LIVES could be put at risk if proposals to cut down on cover at Wrexham Fire Station get the go-ahead.

That was the grim warning after it was revealed North Wales Fire and Rescue Authority will trim £2.4 million from its budget over the next two years.

At its meeting last week, the authority’s executive panel was presented with five options for saving the money, which saw members back a plan to roster crews in a way that needs fewer firefighters.

Although this ensures stations are not closed or the number of appliances cut, it will lead to between 22 and 36 job cuts and save between £850,000 and £1 million.

But further options considered by the panel could have drastic consequences for the Wrexham station.

One would see the axing of one of the two full-time fire engines based at Wrexham along with 24 crew jobs and another would mean the removal of the third back-up engine manned on a part-time basis.

Plaid Cymru’s leader on Wrexham Council, Cllr Marc Jones, warns that if fire chiefs do not hit their £2.4 million cuts target simply by altering rostering arrangements they will turn their attention to the other options, which could endanger lives in Wrexham.

He said: “The authority went for the rostering option but that won’t save them the amount of money they are looking for.

“This is the thin end of the wedge and puts the Wrexham station in the firing line.

“Wrexham has a growing population and more houses being built mean more people.

“There is also a large industrial estate to consider.

“The fire authority has got to come clean on what its plans are for Wrexham because if cuts are made at the station lives could be put at risk.

“The whole community here will be very concerned about any cutbacks.”

A report on the options considered by the executive panel says the axing of the second fire engine at Wrexham, which covers the town centre, Gwersyllt, Coedpoeth, Rossett and Farndon, and reducing 24 full-time posts, along with the second appliance at other stations, would save £874,000.

Cutting the third appliance at Wrexham, which is crewed by part-time firefighters, and elsewhere would save £664,000 but, says the report, would lead to delays in attendance times.

There is also a warning in the report that these cuts could spark industrial action by union members.

A spokeswoman for the fire authority said: “The executive panel voted unanimously to recommend to the authority an option which involved rostering firefighters for duty in a different way to the current system.

“This has the benefit of maintaining all the current stations and appliances within North Wales.

“However, the decision has not been made by the full authority and this will not happen until the meeting on October 17.

“The authority may instead choose one of the five options listed which could be either the removal of the second or third appliance at Wrexham.

“We await the decision of the authority in discharging its duty to deliver a balanced budget for 2012 - 2013.”

You must be a registered user to leave a comment. Register or login here.

  1. Posted by: baldybouncer at 12:16 on 26 September 2011 Report

    This is a stupid thing to do... It will put peoples lives at risk. Earlier this year I had a house fire and the guys from Wrexham firestation arrived promptly and professionally and cannot thank then enough. Services like this should not be touched. If they want to save money stop paying people working in the council so much money for making stupid decisions like this...

  2. Posted by: Mountain man at 18:52 on 26 September 2011 Report

    This could be the only city in the uk with one fire engine!!! When will the people of wrexham wake up and oust this stupid incompetent bunch of idiots that pay lip service to their positions on the council gravy train. We are a laughing stock elsewhere in the uk .

  3. Posted by: mrgrumpy at 21:17 on 26 September 2011 Report

    What a ridiculous idea! Let's hope no-one gets injured before the council wake up and dump this idea!

  4. Posted by: bornacorn at 23:43 on 26 September 2011 Report

    A year ago they were planning to move to the old brother industries site with the ambulance depot AND a small police station. Now they want to cut back? They're so indecisive.

  5. Posted by: WoofyandFluffy at 18:14 on 27 September 2011 Report

    This is nothing to do with councils! This is central Government. North Wales has agerrd to cut an Aerial Appliance from its fleet of 4, leaving a fleet of 3 high reach appliances, Clwyd had 4 and Gwynedd had 2 in the run up to merger. They have also halved the number of Emergency Tenders (Tech Rescue Units now) from 4 to 2. Leading to a delay in heavy rescue equipment reaching incidents.

  6. Posted by: WoofyandFluffy at 18:15 on 27 September 2011 Report

    This is nothing to do with councils! This is central Government. North Wales has agerrd to cut an Aerial Appliance from its fleet of 4, leaving a fleet of 3 high reach appliances, Clwyd had 4 and Gwynedd had 2 in the run up to merger. They have also halved the number of Emergency Tenders (Tech Rescue Units now) from 4 to 2. Leading to a delay in heavy rescue equipment reaching incidents.

  7. Posted by: WoofyandFluffy at 18:23 on 27 September 2011 Report

    The removal of 2nd or 3rd pumping appliances from any stations in North Wales will have a knock on effect throughout NWFRS, leading to less appliances available at times of need, flooding/serious fires etc. It means that the likes of Chirk/Mold/ Flint or Buckley could be devoid of cover whilst their crews are deployed to Wrexham or Deeside on a more regular basis to incidents.

  8. Posted by: MyVoiceCounts at 22:59 on 27 September 2011 Report

    To those putting forward these proposals, consider this scenario: You arrive home from work, your family/pets are trapped, your home's on fire. You call 999, the fire service arrive (2 engines)- there's been frightening explosions, thick, black smoke- your family still trapped. The fire fighters enter your home, some injured as they do so. They find your child, she's not breathing, they resusitate her. Your family is safe, all else is destroyed.......

  9. Posted by: MyVoiceCounts at 23:07 on 27 September 2011 Report

    .....Now imagine the scenario again, but you've made cuts, reduced staff, emergency vehicles and equipment- what would be the outcome for your child this time? Still think the cuts are a good idea? I was lucky, Wxm had a full crew...

  10. Posted by: WoofyandFluffy at 18:50 on 28 September 2011 Report

    Unfortunately MVC they dont think. After the last firefighters dispute new working practices were brought in by UK Govt, Risk catagory areas were thrown out of the window, computer modelling was used. These pillocks dont have to live with the actions they instigate. The same people who brought "managers", accountants and "HR" to emergency services!

  11. Posted by: WoofyandFluffy at 18:52 on 28 September 2011 Report

    . An accountant doesnt strap a Breathing apparatus on his/her back at 3 in the morning to rescue people from a house fire! Lives were never saved with a spreadsheet! Our Wholetime and retained crews (both very dedicated) Have served us well and are a service we can be justly proud of!

  12. Posted by: MyVoiceCounts at 18:01 on 01 October 2011 Report

    You're so right WoofyandFluffy, these so called time/cost saving initiatives cause risks to the general public that are appalling. Because of the fire fighters, their dedication and bravery, my daughter is alive today. I only hope that those making this decision are never in the situation where they hear "she's not breathing" and feel as helpless and lost as I did that day, i wouldn't wish it on anyone. Especially not because of financial implications- money doesn't bring back a lost life.

  13. Posted by: pauliewalnuts at 16:39 on 11 October 2011 Report

    If fire stations aren't closing, and the number of fire engines responding remains the same then how is this a stupid thing to do? Making better use out of tax payers money must be a good thing surely? The fire brigade and its managers ought to be commended for finding a way to provide the same service for less money. Well done I say!!!

 

Local vouchers

View all vouchers


Featured Businesses

View all adverts