ad

What now for Reds as Crusaders bow out?

Published date: 27 July 2011 |
Published by: Phil Robinson and Andrew Boyd


 

BOSSES of Wrexham-based Crusaders dropped the bombshell news yesterday they are pulling out of Super League.

The last-minute decision effectively ends the club’s time in rugby league’s top flight.

It also casts a shadow over ongoing negotiations by Wrexham Supporters Trust to buy Wrexham FC, which shares The Racecourse ground and is also owned by businessmen Geoff Moss and Ian Roberts.

On the day the new league line-up was unveiled, the Crusaders board made the shock announcement they have withdrawn their application to continue playing in it for the next three years.

The current state of finances at the club is blamed for the decision.

But the news immediately sparked a storm of protest, with angry fans and politicians slamming the move.

In a statement Crusaders chief executive Rod Findlay said: “This has not been an easy decision but after a lengthy and exhaustive examination of the club’s finances, our view is that Crusaders is not sustainable as a Super League club at this stage.

“A lot of people have done a lot of work to get us to where we are now, but it has become clear that we cannot continue in our current guise and so a decision was taken to withdraw our licence application.

“It would not have been fair to the players, the supporters, the other clubs or the engage Super League competition for us to proceed with our application.

“We will now sit down with the Rugby Football League to consider our options for 2012 and beyond.

“In the meantime, we remain committed to finishing the current season on a high and I am sure (coach) Iestyn Harris, his coaching staff and the players will do all they can to move us up the tables.”

On Twitter yesterday, Mr Findlay posted: “Application was withdrawn by the directors yesterday. I haven’t lied to anyone.”

Richard Green, chief executive of Wrexham Supporters Trust, which is currently locked into negotiations over Wrexham FC, The Racecourse and Colliers Park training ground, said: “Neither the football club or the rugby club has shared their intentions for Crusaders with us and we need to discuss the implications with the owners.

“Crusaders does provide an income stream for the football club but there are charges to be offset against the income.”

Llyr Huws Gruffydd, Plaid Cymru’s Assembly Member for North Wales, said: “The news of the withdrawal is a complete bolt from the blue and has stunned fans, players and coaching staff alike.

“It’s a disaster for all sports fans in the North.

“This news also jeopardises plans by the Wrexham Supporters Trust to buy the football club and Racecourse ground.

“I would urge Geoff Moss and Ian Roberts to come clean about their intentions and for urgent intervention by Wrexham Council to ensure the Racecourse is maintained as a sporting stadium for the North.”

Wrexham AM Lesley Griffiths said: “While it is a matter of regret that we will not be seeing Super League rugby played in Wrexham next season, this is a decision I am sure has been made with the future progress of the team in mind.”

Crusaders moved from South Wales to Wrexham in 2009.

Last December, club owners Geoff Moss and Ian Roberts signed a loan and guarantee agreement between their company Wrexham Village Ltd, the Rugby Football League (RFL) and Super League (Europe) Ltd, using the Racecourse as security.

A spokesman for the RFL said this arrangement would not be affected by yesterday’s announcement.

Neither Mr Moss nor Mr Roberts were available for comment.


LEADER COMMENT:

IT has hardly been a vintage season for rugby league side Crusaders.

After 22 games, the team are rooted to the bottom of the Super League table with a meagre four points.

Now, though, things could be about to get worse - and not just for the future of the game in Wrexham.

News came yesterday that Crusaders have withdrawn their application to play Super League for the seasons 2012 to 2014.

The decision, says chief executive Rod Findlay, followed 'a lengthy and exhaustive examination' of the club's finances.

Super League rugby 'is not sustainable' and, come the close season, Crusaders will no longer be among the tournament's 14 teams.

It is the end of an - admittedly short - era for the sport, which has a niche yet fervent following across the border in England's north west.

Granting a licence for Crusaders to play Super League in the first place could be seen as an effort by the game's governing body to gain a foothold in Wales.

Two years after their arrival at the Racecourse, it would seem that experiment is over, at least as far as the top flight is concerned.

There is talk of Crusaders playing in the more lowly Co-operative Championship, although at this stage that is not guaranteed.

And we should remember there is a potentially greater cost to Crusaders' departure from Super League.

They started this season on minus four points having gone into administration last November, the legacy of debts largely accrued during their time in South Wales.

The rescue deal saw Wrexham FC owners Geoff Moss and Ian Roberts assume control, with the Racecourse used as security in a loan agreement between Wrexham Village, the Rugby Football League and Super League itself.

And it is here, amid the complex financial arrangements that weave between all parties with an interest in the ground, that speculation will inevitably begin.

Crusaders' future is by no means certain and it cannot be ignored in any discussion about the sale of either Wrexham FC or the Racecourse.

Sports teams on what must be brutally termed 'the way down' are typically faced with falling attendances, the departure of key players and the loss of vital broadcasting revenue.

Will this be the case for Crusaders - and if so, where will that ultimately leave the deal secured on the Racecourse? What if Crusaders folded altogether?

For now these questions cannot be answered. But it is worth recalling - raised eyebrow optional - what Rod Findlay said as recently as March this year.

“I am really excited about the future for Crusaders in Wrexham. Crusaders have a 25-year agreement to play at The Racecourse and this is where we intend to stay.”

You must be a registered user to leave a comment. Register or login here.

  1. Posted by: a cahill at 10:41 on 27 July 2011 Report

    Shouldn't someone let Lesley Griifiths know that not applying for a licence is not progress in any respect...usual guff from our much loved Health Minister.

  2. Posted by: gra3115 at 12:01 on 27 July 2011 Report

    I would say that within 2 to 3 weeks Wrexham AFC will be going bust just like the Crusaders. There are not enough people who want to see Wrexham play and the 1 hundred thousand pounds that WST maybe able to raise will be money wasted and will no way support the club on a long term bases. If Crusaders have borrowed money and used the Racecourse ground as security Wrexham FC will have no ground to play on and no one will loan any money without having an asset to support the loan

  3. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 12:08 on 27 July 2011 Report

    gra3115, you are factually incorrect on manyof your observations. Wrexham FC's average home crownd compared favourably with over 50% of teams in the 1st and 2nd division of the league last year,and by your criteria, we would lose around 60 clubs.

  4. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 12:10 on 27 July 2011 Report

    The reason that WFC are in such trouble is complete mismanagement by Moss and Roberts,not a fault of the fans or team. Ask them where the money for next seasons season tickets has gone? ooops,sorry,you can't, they're on holiday AGAIN!!!

  5. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 12:12 on 27 July 2011 Report

    The WST have funds available in excess of £500,000,and,with the prospective sale of the ground to Glyndwr,a further £500k,meanin a million pounds would be available to get them running to an already in place business plan. The fact is, the current owners want the club dead,not through any fault of the club or fans,but simply to feed their greed.

  6. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 12:14 on 27 July 2011 Report

    Ask yourself this, what would happen to me if I borrowed a large sum of money against your home,even though I obviously don't own it,and then defaulted on the loan? Is that legal,how wouldyou feel, and what would happen? Thats exactly what Moss and Roberts have done with property owned by Wrexham FC.

  7. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 12:17 on 27 July 2011 Report

    As the Leader-less is obviously extremely short on any investigative jounalists, evidenced by their complete lack of reporting on widespread known facts, take a look here to see the latest turn in things : http://www.wst.org.uk/www2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=854:wst-statement-27th-july-2011&catid=24:trust-news

  8. Posted by: InMyOpinion at 12:46 on 27 July 2011 Report

    Ah well.... you cannot say the warning signs were not visible throughout this whole sordid affair.

  9. Posted by: maelor casual at 13:40 on 27 July 2011 Report

    With the Rugby gone I fear for the furture of WREXHAM. Someone please explain how you can carry on running a business ,with the losses the club is making? You could buy the club for a £1 ,but the losses make it a complete no go . WST could not make it through the forthcoming season,without more investment,BUT FROM WHERE?

  10. Posted by: eveningreader at 13:50 on 27 July 2011 Report

    Let's not pull anyone's winky here. Moss and Roberts have run the club down and want the club to go bust! To develop the rest of the land!

  11. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 14:16 on 27 July 2011 Report

    Exactly eveningreader. And they have been aided by the incompetence of the council, who allowed Moss and Roberts planning permission to put up those monstrosities of flats on a PROMISE(!) that income generated would go to the club,with NO LEGALLY BINDING CLAUSE. Unbelievable!

  12. Posted by: Roland Cleth at 15:27 on 27 July 2011 Report

    wrexhamafc, the reason why there wasn't a legal obligation on Moss and Roberts to divert receipts to the football club, is, very simply, because it would not have passed the requirements of Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to be a legally binding planning obligation. Unfortunately, for you and the few other Wrexham FC fans, it is a separate private business and not a "community" facility.

  13. Posted by: maelor casual at 15:47 on 27 July 2011 Report

    I have to agree with Roland Cleth, whats a privately owned Company got to do with Wrexham Council? Alot of worth while companies are struggling at the moment,should the Council support them? When only a small number of Wrexham Residents can be bothered to turn up and support there LOCAL TEAM.

  14. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 16:12 on 27 July 2011 Report

    So why did they bother to make representations to the council stating 'for the avoidanec of doubt,ALL, 100%' of profits will go to the club'? In order to get the planning permission through. There's a whole lot more detail available,but,unfortunately,no space here. Maelor Casual, do you understand the word 'community' ? Obviously not,come back when you have looked it up.

  15. Posted by: wrexhamafc at 16:24 on 27 July 2011 Report

    This isn't about supporting Mo$$ and Robber ts,but supporting the community vehicles that were Crusaders and currently are Wrexham FC., and the hundreds of parents and children that have and are currently using the club's facilities and coaching staff. All will soon be gone,but,I guess that's what you want maelor casual?

  16. Posted by: Roland Cleth at 16:57 on 27 July 2011 Report

    Yes, wrexhamafc, if a promise was made, then that was because nothing better could have been obtained - propping up the football club is nothing to do with the Council; and if the Council had refused the application, then it would have gone to appeal (there being no grounds for refusal) and Moss and Roberts would have won, with the Council (ie tax payer) being left with the bill.

  17. Posted by: Wrexhamafc at 17:53 on 27 July 2011 Report

    Hasn't that set a rather dangerous precedent that in order to get anything past the planning stage you can just lie about what you intend for the future? Ah well, you really deserve the transit camp that Wrexham is becoming. City? Don't make me laugh!

  18. Posted by: adie100965 at 18:52 on 27 July 2011 Report

    This is sad news for the community of Wrexham. Football / Rugby clubs, are very rarely a profitable investments. Unless any organisation has strong financial management, Mr Findlay was correct, although regretful,to withdraw from the Rugby League. Their is criticism concerning the current owners. This is the price we all pay by living in a capitalist society. The pursuant of profit regardless of the cost to society.

  19. Posted by: watchdog at 19:47 on 27 July 2011 Report

    WCBC Planning officer and Legal Officer have much to answer for, as do the planning committee, Especially the councillor who, whilst looking at his watch, suggested the committe took a GAMBLE and moved that planning be given. (Cllr Caldecote)

  20. Posted by: bill336s at 22:16 on 27 July 2011 Report

    The "holidaymakers" are taking the micky. All they want, and they're well on the way to getting it, is the land for development. Look at the company they've been keeping. Con merchants and (banned) ex-directors of dodgy companies. Whatever happened to "Wrexham Village"???? And Lesley, come off the fence cbefore you split your knickers!!!

  21. Posted by: Roland Cleth at 08:44 on 28 July 2011 Report

    watchdog - "WCBC Planning officer and Legal Officer have much to answer for, as do the planning committee" Why? Roberts and Moss made a valid planning application - it was passed. This is just the normal process. If it hadn't been passed they'd have appealed it and won. The Council was simply not in a legal position to impose any conditions relating to the football club.

  22. Posted by: maelor casual at 09:43 on 28 July 2011 Report

    Will Wrexhamafc please explain what the word community has to do with a private business? And you do n;t know your planning law like Roland Cleth.

  23. Posted by: a cahill at 10:31 on 28 July 2011 Report

    Isnt Glyndwr Uni involved in the developement....a charitable organisation supported by tax revenue...making it very much a community asset...but in reality what can you expect when the top people in the Country find it alright to lie when caught out

  24. Posted by: a cahill at 10:39 on 28 July 2011 Report

    Could the directors of Wrexham Village having made public statements to the council planning authority be held accountable under the laws fraud,deception and breach of promise

  25. Posted by: Roland Cleth at 11:35 on 28 July 2011 Report

    Tony, Glyndwr Uni may be involved now/in the future (and weren't at the time of the planning application), but they are/will be only "involved" - the football club itself will still be a private business. And, no, the statements made by Roberts and Moss are not actionable, insofar as they really didn't need to make them anyway - just a way of sweetening the pill for the planners.

  26. Posted by: Roland Cleth at 11:38 on 28 July 2011 Report

    No doubt Roberts and Moss will get their just desserts in some other way. I'm surprised no-one's torched their businesses etc. already.

 

Local vouchers

View all vouchers


Featured Businesses

  • Fostering Solutions
    Fostering Fortnight
    More »
  • Malcolm Hughes Car Sales Ltd
    Do you want to pay less than 3000 with low tax and insurance? If so call now for further details.
    More »
  • Abbeyfield Wrexham Society
    Abbeyfield Wrexham Society's aim is to offer individual self-contained accomodation to elderly people who can no longer cope living alone
    More »
  • Rhosddu Carpets
    High Street service and choices at discount prices. Whether you are looking for carpets, flooring or furniture, we can meet your needs at a price you can afford! Wide range of products – something for every decor.
    More »
View all adverts